September 2009

Porous Pavements Q&A

Answers from the man who wrote the book on the subject

Article Tools

Create a Link to this Article
drain hole

Photo: Robert Ott

Additional Article Content

By Bruce Ferguson

1 Comments

As the use of porous pavements grows, designers and agencies all over North America are learning for the first time this new approach to stormwater management. People like me have been asked to speak to them hundreds of times in the last five years, in workshops, webinars, consulting sessions, and agency testimonies and reviews. The questions that are raised from all the diverse groups have a lot in common.

Since 2005, I have saved 230 files of porous pavement questions conveyed in e-mails, telephone calls, and conference question-and-answer sessions. This article summarizes the questions that I have received most commonly over the years. My answers to them are based on 12 years of research and experience in the field, including surveying research reports, interviews with national experts, and firsthand observations in the field. There is a huge amount of knowledge about porous pavements now, and it is continuing to grow rapidly. The questions reported here are what people most frequently say they need to know.

Q: Is there a recognized measure, or index, of permeability for paving materials?

A: Pervious concrete and permeable pavers that are properly designed, installed, and maintained have surface infiltration rates of 140+ in/hr. An example of research suggesting this is “Study on the Surface Infiltration Rate of Permeable Pavements,” accessible through the North Carolina State University Web site listed at the end of this article.

Q: What is the runoff coefficient?

A: Almost the only runoff coefficient that has ever been measured on properly built porous pavements is zero: There is no runoff, because the surface permeability is so high. But surface runoff coefficient does not take into account the limited capacity of the pavement’s base reservoir: In a long, intense storm, the base could become saturated and overflow, either across the surface or through a perforated drainage pipe if one is provided. At that point, the pavement would in effect be generating runoff. So it would be prudent to use some positive number—not zero—for the runoff coefficient. An example would be to set the runoff coefficient equal to that of the local jurisdiction’s “predevelopment” condition, which might be forest, meadow, or grass. To assign a coefficient larger than predevelopment would be arbitrary. A predevelopment grass surface generates some runoff during large storms, so it provides a valid analogy for porous pavement hydrology.

Q: How much credit should be given for the pavement as a “pervious” surface?

A: Correctly designed, installed, and maintained pervious pavements have surface infiltration rates higher than that of almost any natural soil, and several times greater than the maximum possible rainfall intensity anywhere in the country—in other words, greater than anything that is already called “pervious.” So a surface of this type must be given complete credit for “100% perviousness,” as would a meadow or forest. Giving it any credit less than 100% pervious would fly in the face of scientific evidence.

Q: What is involved in maintaining the pavement “right”?

A: If you are in a municipality where sand or cinders are spread on the roads for winter traction, then vacuuming will be necessary at least once per year: in the spring, following snowmelt. The key word is vacuuming, with or without simultaneous washing, to lift material out and restore the open, permeable pores. Any washing or sweeping without simultaneous vacuuming would just drive sediment farther down into the pores. In areas where there is no sanding or other routine source of sediment, no special maintenance is needed except when something happens such as construction vehicles tracking sediment onto the surface; then the sediment can be removed by vacuuming. Next Page >

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

MattO

December 14th, 2009 6:08 PM PT

Bruce, This is a great summary. In response to your question, "What can my municipality do to encourage the use of porous pavements?" I'd also suggest the following: 1) Municipalities can be proactive and incorporate permitting rules that encourage pervious pavements. A full discussion of such can be found at http://www.perviousblog.com/files/Offenberg%20LDT%20article.pdf 2) There's no better way to encourage the market than to lead by example. Municipalities that want to encourage the use of pervious pavements can demonstrate the technology on their own projects -- whether it be office parking lots, bike paths in parks, or light duty streets -- any municipal application will jump start their market.

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Stormwater E-mail Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Stormwater e-mail newsletter!