The Stormwater Blogs

The Blogger

Janice Kaspersen Janice Kaspersen Stormwater Editor

More from this blogger

  1. Dead Zones
  2. Five Years On
  3. Closer Together
  4. Thanks to the StormCon Moderators!
  5. Dam Breach in Iowa
  6. Two Weeks to StormCon
  7. Mosquitoes and Malaria
  8. More Mosquitoes
  9. Storms in the Gulf
  10. Seeking StormCon Moderators
  11. Never Flooded Before
  12. Storms in the Midwest
  13. Restoring the Penobscot
  14. Hurricanes and Oil
  15. The Uninvited
  16. Half of Our Trees Are Missing
  17. A Hairy Solution
  18. Oil in the Gulf
  19. A Multitalented Plant
  20. Where It Falls
  21. Floating BMPs
  22. Regulating Copper in Brake Pads
  23. EPA Addresses Water Contaminants
  24. Getting Along With the Neighbors
  25. Local Voices in Washington
  26. Out of Sight
  27. Sentinel Species
  28. Collection System
  29. Living Underground
  30. Keeping Stormwater Onsite in LA
  31. Appealing the New Flood Maps
  32. EPA Sets Nutrient Limits for Florida
  33. Some Like It Hot
  34. Skip the Bag, Save the River
  35. Maintenance The Unglamorous Necessity
  36. Put the LID on Stormwater
  37. Federal Responsibility for Katrina Flooding
  38. Certifying Performance
  39. EPA's Construction Effluent Guidelines Released
  40. StormCon Abstracts Due December 2
  41. Reclassified
  42. Reusing Runoff
  43. More Than Just Pipes
  44. Two Announcements from EPA
  45. Separation Anxiety
  46. Federal Funding for Local Projects
  47. Undoing Progress
  48. StormCon 2010 Call for Papers
  49. A Decimal Point Makes a Difference
  50. Lovely as a Tree
  51. Stimulus Funds and Stormwater
  52. Thanks to the StormCon Session Moderators!
  53. Live From StormCon..
  54. StormCon '09 More You Should Know About
  55. Counting Beach Closures
  56. Still Growing
  57. A Combination Problem
  58. One Driveway at a Time
  59. Underground
  60. Making Sure Infrastructure Doesn't Become a Hazard
  61. A Beach Comes Back
  62. With a Grain of Salt
  63. Blocking Out the Storm
  64. LID in Washington State
  65. Florida Gains Land in Public-Private Partnership
  66. A High-Density Debate
  67. Stormwater Management in Plain Sight
  68. Charging More for Potential Pollutants
  69. At Home in the Watershed
  70. We Have Met the Polluter - He Is Us
  71. Mobile Car Wash Runoff
  72. Red River Rising
  73. Summer School
  74. Rain Barrels, Anyone
  75. Getting Serious About the Weather
  76. Taking the Pulse of Utilities
  77. Not Your Ordinary Utility Debate
  78. How Dangerous Is Chitosan, Really Do We Need Certification
  79. Debating Dollars
  80. Demonstrating Green
  81. Paperless Stormwater
  82. Looking for Shovel-Ready Projects
  83. Online Erosion Control Training - Let Us Know What You Think
  84. No Relief Yet for the Northwest
  85. Happy Holidays From Stormwater
  86. Remedying Retention Pond Dangers
  87. New Funding on the Way
  88. The Case of the Missing Manhole Cover
  89. StormCon '09 Abstracts Are Due December 3
  90. A New Plan in the Everglades
  91. Down the Drain
  92. Gunk in the Ocean Our Problem
  93. Save the Date December 3 Is Closer Than You Think
  94. Watershed-Based Permitting
  95. Looking Outside Our Own Backyard
  96. The Clean Watersheds Needs Survey
  97. Show Me the Money, If You Can Find It
  98. The Safety Issue
  99. StormCon '09 Call for Papers
  100. Worse Weather Or Does It Just Seem That Way
  101. Gustav a Reminder of What's Left To Do
  102. Recovering After the Storm
  103. Who Owns the Rain
  104. BMPs and the Bigger Picture
  105. How Are Your Pipes
  106. Regulations We've Got Those Covered, Too
  107. You Asked for BMPs - We've Got 'Em
  108. Simplifying Public Outreach
  109. New Terminology
  110. Buying Time and Space for the Everglades
  111. The Worst Is Over
  112. Midwest Flooding - Could This Have Happened Differently
  113. EPA's Message to Homebuilders
  114. StormCon '08 Is Less Than Two Months Away
  115. Welcome to our new Website!
  116. The State of Water Quality
view all

SW Editor's Blog

July 21st, 2009 6:39am PST

Density Done Well

Posted By Janice Kaspersen 2 Comments

Amid all the debate about land use and the benefits of high-density versus low-density development, it’s refreshing to see some examples of how to get it right. Kaid Benfield, the director of the National Resource Defense Council’s Smart Growth Program, recently posted a slide show illustrating some excellent examples of Smart Growth. Put together by Rachel Sohmer of the NRDC, the slides illustrate neighborhoods around the country that have successfully incorporated Smart Growth.

The idea, paradoxical at first, is that high-density development is good for the watershed—or at least it can be, if we get everything else right as well. Although higher-density developments have a greater percentage of impervious surface than low-density ones—picture a neighborhood with 40 residences per acre and then one with only five per acre—when we look at the watershed-level picture, we actually find less impervious cover.

Those spread-out houses need more infrastructure to link them—more roads, longer driveways. If we consider the difference between 40 individual one- or two-story houses and the same 40 families living in a single high-rise building, the difference is more pronounced. An article in our October 2007 issue offers data from Grand Rapids, Michigan, to illustrate the differences in detail.

The trick to get this to work is that we must leave much of the area that would have been taken up by low-density development as open space. The slides show how this can be done, as well as some other benefits of Smart Growth in action.

 

What Do You Think?

Post a Comment

brambow

July 23rd, 2009 5:38 AM PT

As a stormwater manager for an suburban/exurban area on the outskirts of a large metropolitan area, I second tdechert's comment that low density truly is preferrable to high density in terms of water quality. For me, it comes down to this: "The trick to get this to work is that we must leave much of the area that would have been taken up by low-density development as open space." It's almost a footnote to this story, but in reality this little "trick" is very difficult, unless the government has the money to buy up all the land they want to keep undeveloped. What's more likely to happen is that you have high density development next to another high density development. That chain of events continues and you end up with high density sprawl throughout the watershed, which cannot be prefferable to low density sprawl.

tdechert

July 22nd, 2009 8:43 AM PT

I understand the concept of reducing impervious surface per household in high density development. However, being the stormwater coordinator for a City with fairly clearly divided areas of high, medium and low density development, all with reasonably permeable soils, low density residential development (> 0.5 acre lots)simply produces less stormwater per household to deal with because it infiltrates on site. Further, when there is runoff during an intense storm event, the runoff from the low density areas is much cleaner. When you add that to the fact the folks living in low density developments produce more of their own food, have more green space, and spend more of their free time recreating at home, it seems there should be some recognition that where land is available for low density developement, it is preferable.

Post a Comment

Not a subscriber? Sign Up
 
 
*  
 




 

Get Stormwater E-mail Updates!

Get weekly news and updates through our Stormwater e-mail newsletter!